Définitions énigmatiques

[Nifty]

Thanks for narrowing it down Nifty. From an infinite number of possibilities you've reduced it to around 80,000. I'm just off to resurrect Alan Turing.

If you look at the original clue and apply logic to it
then that should narrow down the possibilities by about 97.8% at least.
I doubt if I could see it if I did not set the clue. Follow simple logic and it is pretty straight forward.
More clues when I have thought of something that should confuse you further.

)))

[FrenchForumSurvivor]

Correct. But, that is not what I wrote.

What you wrote, Nifty, was:

Not a hope with that thing

4, 6, 3,

Is there reasoning behind the numbers being beneath, without brackets, and with a comma after the 3?

[Nifty]

I’ll make it easy peazy for you


i'll need to make one up
Want some papers ?

Not a hope with that thing

4, 6, 3,

Is there reasoning behind the numbers being beneath, without brackets, and with a comma after the 3?

Nothing crypitic , it is just supposed to mean 3 words.

Sorry if I have deviated from convention in any way.

[FrenchForumSurvivor]

I’ll make it easy peazy for you


i'll need to make one up
Want some papers ?

Not a hope with that thing

4, 6, 3,

And the answer is _o_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _r_ ?

[Nifty]

FFS! Three words.
)))

[FrenchForumSurvivor]

FFS! Three words.
)))

You said it yourself, Nifty - "I doubt if I could see it if I did not set the clue." - so how do you expect us to see it?

[dance monkey]

doppelgangers?

[FrenchForumSurvivor]

doppelgangers?

This isn't the Word association thread, dm. Anyway, he says it's three words, I think the first one might be 'roll'.

[Nifty]

First word four letters
Second word six letters
Third word three letters.

[Ally]

Roll ****** *r* ?